| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
12/07/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/07/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
ORTEGA, G.; CHILIBROSTE, P.; GARRIDO, J.M.; WALLER, A.; FARIÑA, S.; LATTANZI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
G. ORTEGA, Facultad de Agronomía Universidad de la República, Departamento de Producción Animal, Ruta 5 km 43, Progreso, Canelones, Uruguay; PABLO CHILIBROSTE, Facultad de Agronomía Universidad de la República, Departamento de Producción Animal, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, Uruguay; J. M. GARRIDO, Facultad de Agronomía Universidad de la República, Departamento de Producción Animal, Ruta 5 km 43, Progreso, Canelones, Uruguay; ALICIA CAROLINA WALLER BARCENA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FARIÑA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Monitoring herbage mass and pasture growth rate of large grazing areas: a comparison of the correspondence, cost and reliability of indirect methods. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Crops and Soils Research Paper. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2023, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859623000333 -- OPEN ACCES. |
|
ISSN : |
0021-8596 |
|
DOI : |
10.1017/S0021859623000333 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 20 December 2022; Revised 15 May 2023; Accepted 24 May 2023; Published online by Cambridge University Press 14 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: G. Ortega; Email: gortegaconforte@gmail.com -- License: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . -- FUNDING: This project was funded by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII) and Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería (RTS) (project number ANII-RTS_X_2014_1_3) who also funded post-graduate scholarship awarded to G. Ortega (POS_NAC_2018_1_151491). -- |
|
Contenido : |
Timely grazing decision-making requires routine information on the herbage mass (HM) and pasture growth rate (GR). The aim of this study was to compare the correspondence, cost, and reliability of two indirect methods -the comparative yield method (COMPYLD) and the pasture-meter (CDAX)- to estimate HM and weekly GR of a 42 ha grazing area. Weekly assessments from Apr 2017 to Oct 2018 were made with both methods to estimate HM and GR of 13 individual paddocks. In addition, estimated GR were compared to aerial net primary productivity (ANPP) estimated using remote sensing (SAT). Estimated HM was 22% lower for COMPYLD than CDAX (HMCOMPYLD=33+0.78*HMCDAX, R2=0.61, CV=17%, RMSE=291 kgDM/ha). The correspondence between methods of estimated weekly GR of individual paddocks was weak (GRCDAX=0.18*GRCOMPYLD+19.1, R2=0.05, CV=73%, RMSE=21.8 kgDM/ha/d). However, when integrated in three-week moving-averages, over the complete grazing area, COMPYLD and CDAX yielded similar GR up to 35 kg DM/ha/d. Accumulating GR of the grazing area over one year resulted similar to annual SAT-estimated ANPP. These results imply that, on one hand, decisions based on nominal HM, such as target HM and grazing strip size, would need to be adjusted depending on the method, but on the other hand, decisions based in temporal trends or GR, such as size and timing of setaside areas for reserves, would be unaffected by method. Compared with COMPYLD, CDAX would be advantageous whenever high labour costs offset higher amortization, maintenance and fuel costs, provided there is an alternative in place to monitor during downtime periods. © 2023 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved. MenosTimely grazing decision-making requires routine information on the herbage mass (HM) and pasture growth rate (GR). The aim of this study was to compare the correspondence, cost, and reliability of two indirect methods -the comparative yield method (COMPYLD) and the pasture-meter (CDAX)- to estimate HM and weekly GR of a 42 ha grazing area. Weekly assessments from Apr 2017 to Oct 2018 were made with both methods to estimate HM and GR of 13 individual paddocks. In addition, estimated GR were compared to aerial net primary productivity (ANPP) estimated using remote sensing (SAT). Estimated HM was 22% lower for COMPYLD than CDAX (HMCOMPYLD=33+0.78*HMCDAX, R2=0.61, CV=17%, RMSE=291 kgDM/ha). The correspondence between methods of estimated weekly GR of individual paddocks was weak (GRCDAX=0.18*GRCOMPYLD+19.1, R2=0.05, CV=73%, RMSE=21.8 kgDM/ha/d). However, when integrated in three-week moving-averages, over the complete grazing area, COMPYLD and CDAX yielded similar GR up to 35 kg DM/ha/d. Accumulating GR of the grazing area over one year resulted similar to annual SAT-estimated ANPP. These results imply that, on one hand, decisions based on nominal HM, such as target HM and grazing strip size, would need to be adjusted depending on the method, but on the other hand, decisions based in temporal trends or GR, such as size and timing of setaside areas for reserves, would be unaffected by method. Compared with COMPYLD, CDAX would be advantageous whenever high labour costs offset high... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Aerial net primary productivity; Cattle; CDAX; Comparative yield method; Milk production. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/8FA844C9EEF4B5DAEA10063F15B9B847/S0021859623000333a.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03237naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1064249
005 2023-07-12
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0021-8596
024 7 $a10.1017/S0021859623000333$2DOI
100 1 $aORTEGA, G.
245 $aMonitoring herbage mass and pasture growth rate of large grazing areas$ba comparison of the correspondence, cost and reliability of indirect methods.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Received 20 December 2022; Revised 15 May 2023; Accepted 24 May 2023; Published online by Cambridge University Press 14 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: G. Ortega; Email: gortegaconforte@gmail.com -- License: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . -- FUNDING: This project was funded by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación (ANII) and Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería (RTS) (project number ANII-RTS_X_2014_1_3) who also funded post-graduate scholarship awarded to G. Ortega (POS_NAC_2018_1_151491). --
520 $aTimely grazing decision-making requires routine information on the herbage mass (HM) and pasture growth rate (GR). The aim of this study was to compare the correspondence, cost, and reliability of two indirect methods -the comparative yield method (COMPYLD) and the pasture-meter (CDAX)- to estimate HM and weekly GR of a 42 ha grazing area. Weekly assessments from Apr 2017 to Oct 2018 were made with both methods to estimate HM and GR of 13 individual paddocks. In addition, estimated GR were compared to aerial net primary productivity (ANPP) estimated using remote sensing (SAT). Estimated HM was 22% lower for COMPYLD than CDAX (HMCOMPYLD=33+0.78*HMCDAX, R2=0.61, CV=17%, RMSE=291 kgDM/ha). The correspondence between methods of estimated weekly GR of individual paddocks was weak (GRCDAX=0.18*GRCOMPYLD+19.1, R2=0.05, CV=73%, RMSE=21.8 kgDM/ha/d). However, when integrated in three-week moving-averages, over the complete grazing area, COMPYLD and CDAX yielded similar GR up to 35 kg DM/ha/d. Accumulating GR of the grazing area over one year resulted similar to annual SAT-estimated ANPP. These results imply that, on one hand, decisions based on nominal HM, such as target HM and grazing strip size, would need to be adjusted depending on the method, but on the other hand, decisions based in temporal trends or GR, such as size and timing of setaside areas for reserves, would be unaffected by method. Compared with COMPYLD, CDAX would be advantageous whenever high labour costs offset higher amortization, maintenance and fuel costs, provided there is an alternative in place to monitor during downtime periods. © 2023 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
653 $aAerial net primary productivity
653 $aCattle
653 $aCDAX
653 $aComparative yield method
653 $aMilk production
700 1 $aCHILIBROSTE, P.
700 1 $aGARRIDO, J.M.
700 1 $aWALLER, A.
700 1 $aFARIÑA, S.
700 1 $aLATTANZI, F.
773 $tThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 2023, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859623000333 -- OPEN ACCES.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 296 | |
| 24. |  | BLUMETTO, O.; CIAPPESONI, G.; BUSTAMANTE, M.; BAPTISTA, R.; CASTAGNA, A.; ECHANDÍA, D.; DE BARBIERI, I. Mejora del desempeño ambiental en ganadería: hacia la valorización económica de los productos y procesos productivos de los sistemas uruguayos. Sustentabilidad. Revista INIA Uruguay, Junio 2023, no.73, p.75-77. (Revista INIA; 73).| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 25. | | BLUMETTO, O.; DE BARBIERI, I.; NAVAJAS, E.; BAETHGEN, W.; BECOÑA, G.; CIAPPESONI, G. Ganadería regenerativa en Uruguay. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2023. 23 p. (INIA, Edición Especial). Revisión técnica: Ing. Agr. PhD Verónica Ciganda y DMV PhD Georgget Banchero. -- Esta publicación deriva del trabajo de investigación del Área de Recursos Naturales, Producción y Ambiente, en el marco del Sistema Ganadero Extensivo.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 26. | | BLUMETTO, O.; DE BARBIERI, I.; NAVAJAS, E.; BAETHGEN, W.; VERA, B.; BECOÑA, G.; CIAPPESONI, G. Regenerative livestock farming in Uruguay. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2023. 23 p. (INIA, Special Edition). Technical review: Ing. Agr. PhD Verónica Ciganda y DMV PhD Georgget Banchero. -- This publication derives from the research work of the Natural Resources, Production and Environment Area, within the framework of the Extensive Livestock...| Tipo: Ediciones Especiales |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 28. | | BRAUNING, R.; CARTA, A.; CIAPPESONI, G.; CLARKE, S.; COCKETT, N.; COULDREY, CH.; DAETWYLER, H.D.; HEATON, M.P.; KIJAS, J.; LARKIN, D.; MCCULLOCH, A.; MCEWAN, J.; MCWILLIAM, S.; MORENO, C.R.; ROWE, S.; SAUNDERS, G.; VENTURA, R. Building the LD Chip and an Update on the Sheep Genomes Database. [W545] In: International Plant & Animal Genome, Conference PAG XXIV, "The largest Ag-genomics Meeting in the World San Diego, CA, USA; January 9-13, 2016. [Abstract] 1 p.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 29. | | BRITO, L.F; BERRY, D.; LARROQUE, H.; SCHENKEI, F.S.; CIAPPESONI, G.; O’BRIEN, A.; TORTEREAU, F.; UGARTE, E.; PALHIERE, I.; BAPST, B.; JAKOBSEN, J.; ANTONAKOS, G.; KOMINAKIS, A.; CLEMENT, V.; BRUNI, G.; LOYWYCK, V.; MASSENDER, E.; OLIVEIRA, H.R.; POSTA, J.; ASTRUC, J.M. Genetic evaluation systems and breeding programs in sheep and goats: an international perspective. Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, 17., No. 26, 2020. Virtual Meeting 1-4 December, 2020. DOI: DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-900-8. p. 560| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 32. | | CARRACELAS, B.; NAVAJAS, E.; VERA, B.; CIAPPESONI, G. Estudio de asociación de genoma completo para resistencia genética a nematodos gastrointestinales en ovinos Corriedale. [abstract]. In: AUPA, Proceedings del VII Congreso Uruguayo de Producción Animal. Sección Una Sola Salud (Single Health Section), 14 y 15 diciembre 2021. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 29(Supl.1), p.96. (Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, Vol.29, Supl.1) Corresponding author: B. Carracelas, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Ruta 48 Km 10, Las Brujas, Uruguay, mailto: bcarracelas@inia.org.uy| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 34. | | CARRACELAS, B.; NAVAJAS, E.; VERA, B.; CIAPPESONI, G. SNP arrays evaluation as tools in genetic improvement in Corriedale sheep in Uruguay. [Evaluación de paneles de SNP como herramientas en la mejora genética de ovinos Corriedale en Uruguay]. [Avaliação de painéis de SNP como ferramentas em melhoramento genético de ovinos Corriedale no Uruguai]. Animal production and pastures. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2022, vol. 26, number 2, article e998. doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.26.998 Article history: Received 09 Feb 2022; Accepted 30 May 2022; Published 19 Aug 2022. Editor: Mariana Carriquiry, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay. Correspondence: Beatriz Carracelas,...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Nacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 36. | | CARRACELAS, B.; PERAZA, P.; VERGARA, A.; CIAPPESONI, G.; RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; LEMA, O.M.; NAVAJAS, E. Banco de ADN genómico animal - plataforma de evaluación genómica. Revista INIA Uruguay, Diciembre 2022, no.71, p. 38-42. (Revista INIA; 71)| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 39. | | CECCOBELLI, S.; LANDI, V.; SENCZUK , G.; MASTRANGELO , S.; SARDINA , M.T.; BEN-JEMAA, S.; PERSICHILLI , C.; KARSLI , T.; BÂLTEANU, V.-A.; RASCHIA , M.A.; POLI, M.A.; CIAPPESONI, G.; MUCHADEYI , F.C.; DZOMBA, E.F.; KUNENE , N.W.; LÜHKEN, G.; DENISKOVA, T.E.; DOTSEV, A.V.; ZINOVIEVA , N.A.; ZSOLNAI , A.; ANTON , I.; KUSZA , S.; CAROLINO , N.; SANTOS-SILVA, F.; KAWECKA, A.; SWIATEK , M.; NIZNIKOWSKI , R.; SPEHAR , M.; ANAYA , G.; GRANERO , A.; PERLOIRO , T.; CARDOSO , P.; GRANDE , S.; LÓPEZ DE LOS SANTOS , B.; DANCHIN-BURGE , C.; PASQUINI , M.; MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ , A.; DELGADO BERMEJO , J.V.; LASAGNA , E.; CIANI , E.; SARTI , F.M.; PILLA , F. A comprehensive analysis of the genetic diversity and environmental adaptability in worldwide Merino and Merino-derived sheep breeds. Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 2023, volume 55, issue 1, article 24. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00797-z Article history: Received 27 July 2022; Accepted 24 March 2023; Published 03 April 2023. -- Corresponding author: Simone Ceccobelli, email: s.ceccobelli@staff.univpm.it -- Document type: Article, Gold Open Access. -- FUNDING: This study...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 296 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
